<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Topaz ReMask 2 Sneak Peek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/topaz-remask-2-sneak-peek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/topaz-remask-2-sneak-peek/</link>
	<description>with Ashley Robinson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:41:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: José Parcerisa Vilatarsana</title>
		<link>http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/topaz-remask-2-sneak-peek/comment-page-1/#comment-2756</link>
		<dc:creator>José Parcerisa Vilatarsana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 03:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/?p=277#comment-2756</guid>
		<description>I already use Topaz adjust, deatil and remask2 and I am very happy with the reults are amaizinag, I would try with the efects as paintings and I dont know which is the best option, Some one could help me?.Thanks in advance. Your friend José.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already use Topaz adjust, deatil and remask2 and I am very happy with the reults are amaizinag, I would try with the efects as paintings and I dont know which is the best option, Some one could help me?.Thanks in advance. Your friend José.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/topaz-remask-2-sneak-peek/comment-page-1/#comment-2138</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/?p=277#comment-2138</guid>
		<description>Hope that in new version interface will dark be gray,from light will much grow old eye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope that in new version interface will dark be gray,from light will much grow old eye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drazick</title>
		<link>http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/topaz-remask-2-sneak-peek/comment-page-1/#comment-2090</link>
		<dc:creator>Drazick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/?p=277#comment-2090</guid>
		<description>Exporting a Mask is the Killer Feature!

You should, in the next version, try to make an improved &quot;Color Range&quot; tool. The one in Photoshop is very limited. I would like to have something like U-Points.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exporting a Mask is the Killer Feature!</p>
<p>You should, in the next version, try to make an improved &#8220;Color Range&#8221; tool. The one in Photoshop is very limited. I would like to have something like U-Points.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/topaz-remask-2-sneak-peek/comment-page-1/#comment-1780</link>
		<dc:creator>J.Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1780</guid>
		<description>I am also looking forward to trying v2. I tried a trial of  v1. It worked, but not as well as I needed it to in areas that didn&#039;t have high contrast. I realize that there needs to be sufficient contrast, it&#039;s just a matter of what degree you can get away with and I need more than what v1 offered.

However, if v2 works a bit better it will be a huge help to me in preparing photos of my work to go on my website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also looking forward to trying v2. I tried a trial of  v1. It worked, but not as well as I needed it to in areas that didn&#8217;t have high contrast. I realize that there needs to be sufficient contrast, it&#8217;s just a matter of what degree you can get away with and I need more than what v1 offered.</p>
<p>However, if v2 works a bit better it will be a huge help to me in preparing photos of my work to go on my website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Weingart</title>
		<link>http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/topaz-remask-2-sneak-peek/comment-page-1/#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Weingart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>I have downloaded ReMask but have not been able to get it to work. I have tried all kinds of adjustments to memory usage but continue to get nothing but procEngine: Error Code -1000.

Will this problem resolved in V2? Is V2 also compatible with PS Elements? 

I&#039;m very excited by the posibilities of this program and am very anxious to get it working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have downloaded ReMask but have not been able to get it to work. I have tried all kinds of adjustments to memory usage but continue to get nothing but procEngine: Error Code -1000.</p>
<p>Will this problem resolved in V2? Is V2 also compatible with PS Elements? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m very excited by the posibilities of this program and am very anxious to get it working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zhak</title>
		<link>http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/topaz-remask-2-sneak-peek/comment-page-1/#comment-1772</link>
		<dc:creator>zhak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1772</guid>
		<description>I purchased Adjust last Friday &amp; downloaded the version dated (I think) Sept 30. I had had a trial version that was an earlier version previously installed. The installation apparently works -- the files are there where they should be &amp; a shortcut created in the plug-ins folder, etc, but the new version will not work for me. I never even seen the Adjust window, I just get an error message saying the program will not work due to &quot;program error.&quot; That&#039;s it. I have Windows XP &amp; am trying to run Adjust within PS CS2. I contacted you folks about this twice last Friday &amp; haven&#039;t heard a peep since. Obviously I&#039;m not pleased, and that&#039;s a shame because Topaz makes some fascinating &amp; helpful applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased Adjust last Friday &amp; downloaded the version dated (I think) Sept 30. I had had a trial version that was an earlier version previously installed. The installation apparently works &#8212; the files are there where they should be &amp; a shortcut created in the plug-ins folder, etc, but the new version will not work for me. I never even seen the Adjust window, I just get an error message saying the program will not work due to &#8220;program error.&#8221; That&#8217;s it. I have Windows XP &amp; am trying to run Adjust within PS CS2. I contacted you folks about this twice last Friday &amp; haven&#8217;t heard a peep since. Obviously I&#8217;m not pleased, and that&#8217;s a shame because Topaz makes some fascinating &amp; helpful applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/topaz-remask-2-sneak-peek/comment-page-1/#comment-1769</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1769</guid>
		<description>Gene - no problem, use what works best for you. But I think you&#039;ll be very happy with ReMask v2: definitely give it a try and if you like it it&#039;s a free upgrade from v1 anyways.

Zhak - I&#039;m very sorry to hear that. We pride ourselves on our customer support and usually get back to you within one business day. What is the problem you&#039;re having?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gene &#8211; no problem, use what works best for you. But I think you&#8217;ll be very happy with ReMask v2: definitely give it a try and if you like it it&#8217;s a free upgrade from v1 anyways.</p>
<p>Zhak &#8211; I&#8217;m very sorry to hear that. We pride ourselves on our customer support and usually get back to you within one business day. What is the problem you&#8217;re having?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zhak</title>
		<link>http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/topaz-remask-2-sneak-peek/comment-page-1/#comment-1768</link>
		<dc:creator>zhak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1768</guid>
		<description>OT: I can&#039;t seem to get an answer from tech support. I&#039;ve tried filling out an online form query &amp; sent an email. I can&#039;t phone because I&#039;m deaf. What should I try next? I purchased a product from you folks that will not work and haven&#039;t gotten any help or feedback at all. :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT: I can&#8217;t seem to get an answer from tech support. I&#8217;ve tried filling out an online form query &amp; sent an email. I can&#8217;t phone because I&#8217;m deaf. What should I try next? I purchased a product from you folks that will not work and haven&#8217;t gotten any help or feedback at all. <img src='http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gene lowinger</title>
		<link>http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/topaz-remask-2-sneak-peek/comment-page-1/#comment-1767</link>
		<dc:creator>gene lowinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topazlabs.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1767</guid>
		<description>I used Remask version 1 for a few days when it was first offered, and was very disappointed because of the number of error messages I received due to the space issue. The concept was very good, so I really wanted it to work for me.  I&#039;m looking forward to trying version 2.  But in the meantime, I&#039;ve had to explore other options for a masking plugin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used Remask version 1 for a few days when it was first offered, and was very disappointed because of the number of error messages I received due to the space issue. The concept was very good, so I really wanted it to work for me.  I&#8217;m looking forward to trying version 2.  But in the meantime, I&#8217;ve had to explore other options for a masking plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

