+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1

    Default Topaz Remask Suggestion

    I actually prefer the "old" interface for defining the mask region using native PS tools. What I don't like about the newer interface is that I can't draw the "compute" area without having the image obscured by either the "keep" or "cut" colors. In other words, it makes more sense to me to FIRST draw the compute area WITHOUT the keep or cut colors being overlaid onto the image, which obscures some of the detail. IOW, I'd really like to be able to see the original image without the semi-transparent red or green overlay WHILE I'm drawing the "compute" region.

    This approach makes more sense both practically and semantically. From a practical standpoint, it's easier to see fine detail when it's not obscured by a semi-transparent overlay. And semantically, when creating a mask, I don't start off by thinking that I'm first going to either reject or accept the entire image. I start by thinking about where the boundary is between the portions of the image I'm going to mask and the portions I'm going to accept.

    So please, allows me to draw the "compute" (boundary) on an unobscured image.

    Thanks,

    -Steve

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Having just started to get acquainted with Remask 2, I wholeheartedly agree with Steve's observations above. I think that the red and green overlays should ideally be optional during the 'painting blue' boundary stage, at least until the blue border line has been closed. After that, maybe a simple button to switch the red/green overlay on/off, so that smaller cut-outs can be made with precision?

    I also like the 'semantic' argument.

    Best,

    Joachim

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1

    Default

    I'll third this suggestion, I've definitely found the masking colors distracting.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    2,076

    Default

    I thought it was just me! I still use and prefer the original version too.

    Mike

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Chicago, IL USA
    Posts
    104

    Default

    I agree and this has been suggested many times but Topaz does not appear to be listening.

    Dan

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    7

    Default

    See post #4 in this thread: http://www.topazlabs.com/forum/gener...emask-2-a.html. I think this technique addresses your issue.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts